RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03669
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 15 Jul 13 be removed from his
records.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was not given proper credit for the number of push-ups
completed. After the initial 20 seconds of the contested FA,
his counting partner had calculated a total of 30 push-ups.
However, the PT monitor informed the applicant that none of the
push-ups already completed counted. As a result, he was
credited with zero points for pushups, resulting in an overall
composite score of 80.00 and a satisfactory rating. All prior
tests were greater than 90 percent and there is no apparent
reason why the contested FA should be different.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant served in the Regular Air Force during the matter
under review.
On 15 Jul 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and
was credited with 8.00 points for the push-up component; he was
credited with an overall composite score of 80.00 points, an
overall satisfactory rating.
On 14 Jan 14, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB)
disapproved the applicants request for relief on the basis that
there was no AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, or AF
Form 422, Notification of Air Force Members Qualification
Status, was provided.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of
an error or an injustice. While the applicant contends that he
was not given full credit for the number of push-ups he had
completed resulting in a satisfactory rating and overall
composite score of 80.00, his request lacks supporting
documentation to support his claim. The instructions for
completing the push-up component of the FA are outlined in AFI
36-2905 AFGM 2.1 (dated 3 Jan 13). The applicant should have
contacted the FA monitor when he believed his push-ups were
counted incorrectly.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 14 Feb 14 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit C).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number 2013-03669 in Executive Session on 21 May 14, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Jul 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 31 Oct 13.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Feb 14.
1
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01022
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01022 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her fitness assessment (FA) score recorded on 13 Feb 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). Incorrect sit-ups (e.g., elbows do not touch the knees or thighs at the top of the sit-up, shoulder blades do not touch the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02738
As a result we have concluded that the recorded AC scores are not an accurate reflection of applicant's abdominal circumference. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Dec 13 for review and comment within 30 days. The applicant has provided documentation validating he had a medical condition that affected his ability to pass the AC...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00963
The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 5 Apr 13 90.40 Excellent 16 Jan 13 78.40 Unsatisfactory 14 Jun 12 100.00 Excellent *7 May 12 88.70 Unsatisfactory 8 Feb 12 79.90 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03220
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03220 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 29 Oct 10, 28 Oct 11, and 16 Nov 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant clarifies in his response to the Air Force Evaluation that the FA he is...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03235
The applicants last 10 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Push Ups Rating 23 Aug 13 92.63 Exempt Excellent 29 May 13 21.38 Exempt Unsatisfactory 5 Feb 13 84.10 21/6.00 Unsatisfactory 19 Jul 12 79.67 22/6.30 Satisfactory 13 Mar 12 Exempt Exempt Exempt 21 Oct 11 85.00 19/5.50 Satisfactory *6 Sep 11 73.67 18/5.00 Unsatisfactory *20 Jul 11 81.00 16/4.30 Unsatisfactory 5 Nov 10 96.25 Exempt Excellent 14 May 10 75.20 25/8.00 Good *Contested FA On 14 Feb 14, a similar request was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02538
For RegAF and AGR Airmen, the FAC (or UFPM where no FAC exists) will enter the FA results in AFFMS on the 6th duty day if the Commander does not invalidate test results or no response from the Commander is received within this timeframe; Atch 1, Para 10a. Commander memorandum, medical docs, or FAC memorandum). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request to remove the contested FA from AFFMS,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04468
Finally, the applicant did not provide any additional supporting documentation to consider, i.e., commanders invalidation, AF Form 422, etc. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request to void and remove the FAs dated 22 Feb 11, 1 Mar 11, and 22 Jun 11. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM and AFPC/DPSIDE evaluations is at Exhibit B and Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01784
The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 28 Jan 13 0.00 Unsatisfactory 29 Oct 12 68.78 Unsatisfactory 30 Apr 12 88.00 Satisfactory 20 Oct 11 Exempt Exempt *26 Jul 11 67.50 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA On 16 Dec 13 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to Insufficient evidence, specifically no commander invalidation. In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00822
The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 30 Jul 13 85.40 Satisfactory 1 Feb 13 75.33 Satisfactory *19 Dec 12 32.50 Unsatisfactory 7 Jun 12 83.50 Satisfactory 29 Feb 12 38.10 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02502
His records be corrected to show that he is now and was promotion eligible during the time he was placed on a Control Roster. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOA recommends closing the case, since the applicant's record currently reflects his requested actions and they do not have the history, nor are they the OPR for control roster actions; however, based on the information provided the previous RE code 4I would have been a result of...